I’m about to tell you about three mistakes that cost Balmain pre-retirees an average of $200,000-$300,000 over their retirement.

These aren’t exotic financial strategies or complex tax schemes.

They’re simple, common mistakes that I see every single week in my Balmain office.

The worst part? Most people don’t even realize they’re making them until it’s too late.

Last month, I sat with a couple – let’s call them John and Margaret – who’d just retired. Combined super: $720,000. Paid-off Balmain home worth $2.8M. They looked set.

But they’d made Mistake #1 (which I’ll explain shortly), and it cost them approximately $280,000 over their expected retirement.

That’s not a typo. $280,000. Gone. Because of one preventable mistake.

Here’s the thing about retirement planning mistakes: They compound. They multiply. A small error at age 60 becomes a six-figure problem by age 75.

So let me show you the three biggest mistakes Balmain locals make – and more importantly, how to avoid them.

Mistake #1: Ignoring Age Pension Optimization (Cost: $250,000-$400,000)

This is the big one. The mistake that costs more than any other.

And it’s incredibly common among Balmain homeowners with decent super balances.

What the Mistake Looks Like

You own your Balmain home outright (or nearly). You’ve got $700,000-$900,000 in super. You’re responsible, frugal, independent.

You assume: “I won’t get any Age Pension. My assets are too high. I need to be completely self-funded.”

So you plan your entire retirement around zero Age Pension income.

Problem: You’re wrong. And that assumption costs you hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The Reality Most People Miss

Your home doesn’t count in the Age Pension assets test.

You could have a $3 million Balmain terrace, and Centrelink ignores it completely.

What counts:

  • Your super balance
  • Investment properties
  • Shares outside super
  • Cash and bank accounts

Current thresholds (2025) for homeowners:

Couples can have up to $1,002,000 in assets and still receive part Age Pension

Singles can have up to $704,500 in assets and still receive part Age Pension

Even a part pension of $15,000-$20,000/year is massive over 25 years.

“How the Age Pension Actually Works”

Real Example: John and Margaret’s $280,000 Mistake

Remember John and Margaret from the opening?

Combined super: $720,000

Home: Paid off, worth $2.8M

They’d planned their retirement assuming zero Age Pension.

Their plan: Draw $48,000/year from super until it runs out.

The problem: They actually qualified for approximately $16,000/year part Age Pension.

But they didn’t know. So they drew more from super than necessary.

The cost:

Over 25 years: $16,000/year × 25 = $400,000 in Age Pension they didn’t know they could claim

Plus: By drawing down super faster, they reduced their balance, which would have eventually qualified them for even MORE Age Pension

Total opportunity cost: ~$280,000 over retirement

All because they didn’t spend 30 minutes with the Age Pension calculator.

How to Avoid This Mistake

Step 1: Use the Services Australia Age Pension calculator RIGHT NOW

Age Pension calculator

Input your actual numbers:

  • Do you own your home? (Yes)
  • Super balance
  • Other investments
  • Any other assessable assets

Step 2: Understand strategic positioning

If you’re close to the threshold, strategic decisions can make a huge difference:

  • Timing of super contributions
  • When to start drawing down
  • Whether to gift money to adult children
  • How to structure investments

Step 3: Re-assess every 2-3 years

As you draw down super, your assets reduce. Your Age Pension entitlement increases.

Someone who gets zero Age Pension at 67 might qualify for $10,000/year by 72 and $20,000/year by 77.

But only if they’re checking regularly.

The Bottom Line on Mistake #1

If you haven’t calculated your Age Pension entitlement in the last 6 months, you’re probably leaving money on the table.

For Balmain homeowners with $600k-$900k in super, that’s typically worth $250,000-$400,000 over a 25-year retirement.

Mistake #2: Paying Off Your Mortgage Too Late (Or Not At All)

This one destroys retirement plans.

I see it constantly: Someone retires at 65 with $750,000 in super and a $280,000 mortgage with 8 years remaining.

“We’ll just keep making the repayments from super,” they say.

Big mistake.

Why This Is So Costly

Let’s do the math:

$280,000 mortgage, 8 years remaining, 5.5% interest rate

Monthly repayment: ~$3,400

Annual cost: ~$41,000

Over 8 years, you’ll pay:

Principal: $280,000

Interest: ~$45,000

Total: $325,000

Now, you’re drawing $41,000/year from super to make these repayments.

But here’s what you’re missing:

That $41,000/year isn’t just leaving your super. It’s also:

  • Reducing your super balance faster (less compound growth)
  • Limiting your Age Pension eligibility (more assets = less pension)
  • Creating stress and cash flow pressure

The real cost isn’t $325,000. It’s closer to $400,000-$450,000 when you factor in lost investment growth and reduced Age Pension over 20+ years.

Real Example: The Couple Who Kept Their Mortgage

David and Lisa, both 64, Lilyfield.

Super: $680,000 combined

Mortgage: $310,000 remaining (10 years left)

They retired anyway, planning to pay the mortgage from super.

Within three years, they were stressed.

Super balance: Down to $550,000

Annual costs: $63,000 (including $38,000 mortgage payments)

Super drawdown: $63,000/year

At that rate, their super would be gone by age 73.

They ended up selling their home at 67, downsizing to an apartment, and using the equity to clear the mortgage.

If they’d done that at 64 instead of 67, they’d have saved ~$45,000 in interest plus three years of stress.

“Balmain Property Prices and Your Retirement

The Better Strategy

Option 1: Pay it off before you retire

If you’re 60 with $280,000 owing:

  • Salary sacrifice aggressively for 3-4 years
  • Make extra repayments
  • Use any bonus/redundancy to clear it

Then retire mortgage-free at 63-64 instead of 60 with a mortgage.

Option 2: Use accessible super to clear it at retirement

If you’re 60+ and can access your super, pay off the mortgage in full.

Yes, it reduces your super balance. But it dramatically reduces your annual costs.

Example:

Super: $650,000

Mortgage: $250,000

Option A (keep mortgage): Draw $53,000/year from super ($32k living + $21k mortgage)

Option B (pay off mortgage): Use $250k from super, leaving $400k. Draw $32,000/year.

Option B is better:

  • Lower annual drawdown (super lasts longer)
  • Less stress
  • Eventually qualify for more Age Pension (lower assets)

Option 3: Downsize strategically

If your Balmain property is worth $2.5M+ and you owe $300k:

Sell, buy a $1.3M apartment, clear the mortgage, bank $900k+ after costs.

Your mortgage problem just became a surplus income opportunity.

The Bottom Line on Mistake #2

Carrying a mortgage into retirement costs you $150,000-$300,000+ over 20 years through interest, lost investment growth, and reduced Age Pension.

Clear it before you retire, or have a very clear plan for clearing it within 2-3 years.

Mistake #3: Wrong Investment Strategy for Your Timeline (Cost: $100,000-$250,000)

This one’s subtle but devastating.

Your investment strategy should match your retirement timeline.

Get it wrong, and you either:

  • Lose massive amounts in a market crash right before retirement, OR
  • Miss out on years of growth by being too conservative too early

Both mistakes cost six figures.

The Two Ways This Goes Wrong

Problem A: Too aggressive too late

You’re 63, retiring in 2 years. Your super is 80% in high-growth shares.

Market crashes (like 2008, 2020). Your $700,000 drops to $490,000 overnight.

You either:

  • Delay retirement 3-5 years (cost: years of your life)
  • Retire anyway and lock in losses (cost: $210,000)

Problem B: Too conservative too early

You’re 52, retiring at 67. Your super is 100% in cash and bonds earning 2.5%.

Over 15 years, you miss out on 5-6% returns from balanced growth.

Cost: ~$180,000 in lost compound growth on a $500,000 balance.

“Retirement Income vs Lump Sum”

Real Example: The Market Crash That Delayed Retirement

Robert, 64, planned to retire at 65.

Super in February 2020: $820,000 (invested 85% in growth assets)

Super in April 2020: $640,000 (market crash)

He panicked. Stayed working three more years until his super recovered.

The cost:

  • Three years of his 60s spent working instead of retired
  • Stress and regret

If he’d shifted to a more conservative strategy at 62, the crash would have hit him much softer ($750,000 instead of $640,000), and he could have retired as planned.

The Right Strategy by Timeline

Here’s the framework:

10+ years until retirement:

  • 60-80% growth assets is fine
  • You have time to recover from downturns
  • Focus on accumulation and compound growth

5-10 years until retirement:

  • Shift to 50-60% growth, 40-50% defensive
  • Balanced approach
  • Start thinking about income generation

2-5 years until retirement:

  • Shift to 30-40% growth, 60-70% defensive/income
  • Capital preservation becomes important
  • Focus on reliable income streams

Retired (or within 12 months):

  • 20-30% growth, 70-80% income/defensive
  • Sustainable income generation
  • Protect against major market shocks

The Income-Focused Approach

Once you’re within 5 years of retirement, shift your thinking:

Stop asking: “How much will my super grow?”

Start asking: “How much reliable income can my super generate?”

This means:

  • Dividend-paying shares instead of pure growth stocks
  • Income-focused managed funds
  • Hybrid securities
  • Some defensive assets (bonds, cash)

The goal: Generate $40,000-$50,000/year reliably from a $700,000 balance, regardless of what the market does.

You’re not trying to turn $700k into $1M. You’re trying to create sustainable income.

How to Check Your Strategy Right Now

Log into your super fund.

Look at your investment option. What’s your allocation?

Ask yourself:

  1. When am I planning to retire?
  2. Does my current investment strategy match that timeline?
  3. If the market dropped 30% tomorrow, would it derail my retirement?

If the answer to #3 is “yes,” you’re too aggressive.

The Bottom Line on Mistake #3

Getting your investment strategy wrong costs $100,000-$250,000 through either market losses at the wrong time or missed growth opportunities.

Match your strategy to your timeline. Shift gradually. Don’t wait until 12 months before retirement to change everything.

The Compounding Effect of Multiple Mistakes

Here’s the really scary part:

These mistakes don’t exist in isolation. They compound each other.

Real example: A Balmain couple who made all three mistakes:

Mistake #1: Ignored Age Pension (cost: $320,000 over 25 years)

Mistake #2: Kept $260,000 mortgage until age 70 (cost: $180,000 in interest + lost growth)

Mistake #3: Too aggressive at 64, lost $150,000 in market crash (cost: 3 years delayed retirement)

Total cost: $650,000+

That’s not a hypothetical. That’s a real couple I met in 2023.

They’re now 68, still working, and deeply regret not getting proper advice at 62.

How to Avoid All Three Mistakes

Here’s your action plan:

Step 1: Age Pension Audit (This Week)

Go to servicesaustralia.gov.au

Use the Age Pension calculator

Input your actual numbers

If you qualify for ANY Age Pension, factor it into your retirement plan

Time required: 20 minutes

Potential value: $250,000-$400,000

Step 2: Mortgage Strategy (This Month)

If you have a mortgage:

  • How much do you owe?
  • When will it be paid off?
  • What’s your plan to clear it before/at retirement?

If you’re retiring in 3-5 years with significant mortgage debt, get advice NOW on the best strategy (pay down vs lump sum vs downsize).

Time required: 2-3 hours of analysis

Potential value: $150,000-$300,000

Step 3: Investment Strategy Review (This Quarter)

Log into your super

Check your investment allocation

Compare it to your retirement timeline (using the framework above)

If there’s a mismatch, change it

Most super funds let you switch investment options online in minutes

Time required: 1 hour

Potential value: $100,000-$250,000

The $600,000 Question

Here’s what I tell every Balmain pre-retiree:

You can lose $200,000-$600,000 over your retirement by making these three mistakes.

OR you can spend a few hours and a few hundred dollars getting proper advice and avoid them completely.

Which makes more sense?

Most people spend more time planning a two-week holiday than planning a 30-year retirement.

Then they wonder why they’re struggling at 72.

Don’t be that person.

The Bottom Line

These three mistakes – ignoring Age Pension, carrying mortgage debt into retirement, and wrong investment strategy for your timeline – cost Balmain retirees an average of $200,000-$300,000 each.

Combined? Up to $600,000+ over a 25-year retirement.

The good news: They’re all preventable.

The bad news: Most people don’t realize they’re making them until it’s too late.

You’ve now been warned.

What you do with that information is up to you.

Find Out If You’re Making These Mistakes

Most Balmain pre-retirees are making at least one of these mistakes. Many are making all three.

The One Page Financial Plan identifies which mistakes you’re making (or about to make) and shows you exactly how to avoid them.

For $660 (inc GST), you’ll discover:

✓ Your actual Age Pension entitlement (not a guess)

✓ Whether your mortgage strategy is costing you six figures

✓ If your investment strategy matches your retirement timeline

✓ Exactly what to change to avoid these costly mistakes

✓ 100% satisfaction guaranteed

One Page Financial Plan

📧 Email: adam@suncow.com.au

📞 Phone: 0418 785 200

Recent Posts

Information provided by Suncow Wealth is general in nature and does not take into consideration your personal financial situation. It is for educational purposes only and does not constitute formal financial advice. Remember, the value of any investment can go down as well as up. Before acting, you should consider seeking independent personal financial advice that is tailored to your needs. Suncow Wealth Pty Ltd is a Corporate Representative No.441116 of AFSL 342766.